из англоязычных сайтов 5 признаков дениализма http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/about/ Теории заговоров (conspiracy), все остальные врут или заблуждаются Избирательность (selectivity (cherry-picking)),берутся только те исследования (независимо от их качества), которые поддерживают нужную идею, Фальшивые, ненастоящие эксперты (fake experts), Нереальные ожидания (impossible expectations (also known as moving goalposts), Ошибки восприятия и логики, заблуждения (general fallacies of logic).
+ очень понравилась такая мысль http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2012/11/01/tribalism-cultural-cognition-ideology-were-all-talking-about-the-same-thing-here/ Наука, псевдонаука, дениализм и идеология. "First, denialism is not an explanation for the science communication problem. It is a description of tactics used by those promoting bogus theories. Denialism is the symptom, ideology is the cause, and what we consider ideology seems more or less synonymous with this “identity-protective cognition”, while being less of a mouthful.
Call it what you will, when you have ideology, or religion, or politics, or other deeply held beliefs which define your existence and your concept of “truth”, conflicts with this central belief are not just upsetting, they create an existential crisis. When science conflicts with your ideology, it conflicts with who you are as person, how you believe you should live your life, what you’ve been raised to believe. And, almost no matter what ideology you subscribe to, eventually science will come in conflict with it, because no ideology, religion, or political philosophy is perfect. Eventually, they will all jar with reality. And what do most people do when science creates such a conflict? Do they change who they are, fundamentally, as a person? Of course not. They just deny the science."
пожалуйста :-) На английском существует целый ряд блогов (в различных науках и сферах жизни), где прорабатываются вопросы отрицания науки и лженаук. Я была рада, когда их нашла. Еще хорошо то, что там много интересных комментаторов.
Однако, дениализм не на 100 процентов совпадает с псевдонаукой;-))) Бывает отрицание и Холокоста,напрпоэтомуи определить ее гораздо сложнее Вон, что Вика о псевдонауке говорит: The demarcation problem between science and pseudoscience has ethical political implications, as well as philosophical and scientific issues.[6] Differentiating science from pseudoscience has practical implications in the case of health care, expert testimony, environmental policies, and science education.[7] Distinguishing scientific facts and theories from pseudoscientific beliefs such as those found in astrology, medical quackery, and occult beliefs combined with scientific concepts, is part of science education and scientific literacy.[8]
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 09:31 am (UTC)5 признаков дениализма http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/about/
Теории заговоров (conspiracy), все остальные врут или заблуждаются
Избирательность (selectivity (cherry-picking)),берутся только те исследования (независимо от их качества), которые поддерживают нужную идею,
Фальшивые, ненастоящие эксперты (fake experts),
Нереальные ожидания (impossible expectations (also known as moving goalposts),
Ошибки восприятия и логики, заблуждения (general fallacies of logic).
Распростаненные приемы дениалистов и способы им противостоять. Emil Karlsson http://debunkingdenialism.com/2011/11/10/common-denialist-tactics-defined-and-destroyed/ - на англ, перевод на русский здесь - http://homers-wife.livejournal.com/110827.html
Как стать продвинутым скептиком? http://debunkingdenialism.com/2011/11/11/how-to-become-a-better-scientific-skeptic/ - на англ, перевод на русский здесь - http://homers-wife.livejournal.com/115227.html
+ очень понравилась такая мысль
http://scienceblogs.com/denialism/2012/11/01/tribalism-cultural-cognition-ideology-were-all-talking-about-the-same-thing-here/
Наука, псевдонаука, дениализм и идеология.
"First, denialism is not an explanation for the science communication problem. It is a description of tactics used by those promoting bogus theories. Denialism is the symptom, ideology is the cause, and what we consider ideology seems more or less synonymous with this “identity-protective cognition”, while being less of a mouthful.
Call it what you will, when you have ideology, or religion, or politics, or other deeply held beliefs which define your existence and your concept of “truth”, conflicts with this central belief are not just upsetting, they create an existential crisis. When science conflicts with your ideology, it conflicts with who you are as person, how you believe you should live your life, what you’ve been raised to believe. And, almost no matter what ideology you subscribe to, eventually science will come in conflict with it, because no ideology, religion, or political philosophy is perfect. Eventually, they will all jar with reality. And what do most people do when science creates such a conflict? Do they change who they are, fundamentally, as a person? Of course not. They just deny the science."
no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 09:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-21 08:37 am (UTC)и перевод/пересказ http://homers-wife.livejournal.com/128114.html
как правильно опровергать мифы/заблуждения
no subject
Date: 2012-12-30 10:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-05 12:50 pm (UTC)Бывает отрицание и Холокоста,напрпоэтомуи определить ее гораздо сложнее
Вон, что Вика о псевдонауке говорит: The demarcation problem between science and pseudoscience has ethical political implications, as well as philosophical and scientific issues.[6] Differentiating science from pseudoscience has practical implications in the case of health care, expert testimony, environmental policies, and science education.[7] Distinguishing scientific facts and theories from pseudoscientific beliefs such as those found in astrology, medical quackery, and occult beliefs combined with scientific concepts, is part of science education and scientific literacy.[8]