But a naturalist would undoubtedly have ranked as an ape or a monkey, an ancient form which possessed many characters common to the catarhine and platyrhine monkeys, other characters in an intermediate condition, and some few, perhaps, distinct from those now found in either group. And as man from a genealogical point of view belongs to the catarhine or Old World stock, we must conclude, however much the conclusion may revolt our pride, that our early progenitors would have been properly thus designated.
"В-третьих, кого биологи считают обезьянами, записано в сответствующем документе (Кодексе зоологической номенклатуры), это вопрос систематики." - Само собой разумеется, что там нет слова "обезьяны".
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Re: В милионный раз...
Date: 2011-10-22 08:32 pm (UTC)But a naturalist would undoubtedly have ranked as an ape or a monkey, an ancient form which possessed many characters common to the catarhine and platyrhine monkeys, other characters in an intermediate condition, and some few, perhaps, distinct from those now found in either group. And as man from a genealogical point of view belongs to the catarhine or Old World stock, we must conclude, however much the conclusion may revolt our pride, that our early progenitors would have been properly thus designated.
"В-третьих, кого биологи считают обезьянами, записано в сответствующем документе (Кодексе зоологической номенклатуры), это вопрос систематики." - Само собой разумеется, что там нет слова "обезьяны".