Однако, дениализм не на 100 процентов совпадает с псевдонаукой;-))) Бывает отрицание и Холокоста,напрпоэтомуи определить ее гораздо сложнее Вон, что Вика о псевдонауке говорит: The demarcation problem between science and pseudoscience has ethical political implications, as well as philosophical and scientific issues.[6] Differentiating science from pseudoscience has practical implications in the case of health care, expert testimony, environmental policies, and science education.[7] Distinguishing scientific facts and theories from pseudoscientific beliefs such as those found in astrology, medical quackery, and occult beliefs combined with scientific concepts, is part of science education and scientific literacy.[8]
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
macroevolution) wrote2012-12-30 12:58 pm
no subject
Бывает отрицание и Холокоста,напрпоэтомуи определить ее гораздо сложнее
Вон, что Вика о псевдонауке говорит: The demarcation problem between science and pseudoscience has ethical political implications, as well as philosophical and scientific issues.[6] Differentiating science from pseudoscience has practical implications in the case of health care, expert testimony, environmental policies, and science education.[7] Distinguishing scientific facts and theories from pseudoscientific beliefs such as those found in astrology, medical quackery, and occult beliefs combined with scientific concepts, is part of science education and scientific literacy.[8]